Tải bản đầy đủ - 0 (trang)
7 Maria Hertogh: A Case in Point

7 Maria Hertogh: A Case in Point

Tải bản đầy đủ - 0trang

April 7, 2005


WSPC/SPI-B265: Islamic History


Colonial Legacies: Islam and State Law in South-east Asia


all the issues just outlined. The background here is as follows:

Maria Hertogh was a Dutch Eurasian girl who had been separated from her parents when they were interned in Java during the Japanese occupation and was cared for and brought

up as a Muslim by a servant of her parents. Her father traced

her whereabouts after the war and attempted to regain custody of his daughter. Although he succeeded in an action

brought before the Singapore High Court, there was a complication in that the girl, though only aged fifteen at that

time, was already married to a Muslim man. The Court was

asked to decide on the validity of the marriage. In fact, it was

found that the girl was a Muslim. It was decided, however,

both at first instance and on appeal, that the marriage was

invalid and a variety of different reasons were put forward,

at both levels, to justify this decision. All jurisdictions started

from the fundamental private international law (conflicts of

law) principle that capacity to marry is determined by the

law of the domicile at the time of marriage. In the case of a

minor her domicile was that of the father, in this instance the

Netherlands. According to this law, a girl had no capacity to

marry at the age of fifteen unless certain permissions had been

obtained. Naturally these permissions had not been obtained

and the marriage was thus declared invalid. The Court’s decision resulted in three days of violent rioting by certain elements of Singapore’s Muslim community which left eighteen

dead and 173 injured.

This is the sort of reasoning, based on an orthodox interpretation of the law in a situation where there was serious

conflict of legal principles, that was criticised as being mechanical and unsuitable to the needs of a multi-ethnic society,

such as Singapore, in which a variety of religious and racial

groups live side by side and as we have seen, resulted in violent political confrontation between Muslims and the State

authorities. From the Muslim point of view, the judgement

April 7, 2005



WSPC/SPI-B265: Islamic History


Islamic Banking and Finance in South-east Asia

was an unwarranted interference in what was a perfectly valid

arrangement under Muslim law — after all, the Court had

also found as a fact that the girl was “Muslim”. This impasse

could have been avoided by placing the social implications

of a decision before the technical constraints of laws which

are not designed to deal with the implications of internal conflicts involving personal laws. Such a solution may, however,

be thought slightly too radical in that it tends to dispose of

a major principle of common law conflicts of laws, viz. that

domicile determines the right to decide the application of a

personal law.

One of the judgements in the Hertogh case, however, consisted of an ingenious attempt to find a way round the criticisms just made, whilst simultaneously giving effect to English

conflicts of laws principles. Justice J. Brown began from the

proposition that because the girl was Muslim and the marriage

was valid according to Muslim law, it was the latter which must

determine validity. He then found that Muslim law required

validity to be judged by the law of the place of contracting; this

was taken to be a reference to English law and, by extension, to

the English conflicts of laws. This view rests upon an equation

of contracts of marriage with all other contracts under Muslim law. In the event, the domicile rule prevailed, despite the

fact that dependent domicile — in this case the Netherlands —

had nothing to do with the concept of one’s home nor with the

relevant religion.138

Countless other instances could be given of conflicts arising out of differences between English law and Shari’ah law

in former British colonies, but they would do no more than

underscore the point that has already been made by the

Maria Hertogh case, namely that at a general level, the two


Hooker, M. B., 1984, op cit, p. 120.

April 7, 2005


WSPC/SPI-B265: Islamic History


Colonial Legacies: Islam and State Law in South-east Asia


systems of law are all too often incompatible making conflict

inevitable and indeed endemic. The situation is complicated

still further by the possibility of conflict between statutory laws

and legal precedents as well as the private international law




In 1957, the newly independent Malaya opted for a continuation of the existing British legal system, but the recent

history of Islamic legal administration in Malaysia has been

one of a continuing development towards a more direct

and exact implementation of Islamic precepts. In the colonial era, the legal administration was primarily concerned

to implement only those precepts that were immediately

required so as to avoid offending the religious sensitivities

of the Malay peoples. In effect this limited Islamic law to

“Muslim family law” and the latter was further restricted in

some places and for some subjects by local customary law

or adat.

Since Malaysian independence, however, there has been a

move towards a more complete and comprehensive expression

of Islamic legalism. The legislature and the Religious Courts

have been an important element in this, as has the creation of

the State Religious Departments. A significant move was the

formation of the National Council for Islamic Affairs in 1968,

which later was incorporated as Religious Affairs Division of

the Prime Minister’s Department in February 1974. From its

inception the Council had a Fatwa Committee whose function was to make rulings for the Conference of Rulers. The

membership consisted of the Mufti (an attorney in Islamic law)

of each State plus a Muslim appointed by the Conference from

among the officers of the (secular) Judicial and Legal Service.

The Council also had a number of ad hoc committees which

April 7, 2005



WSPC/SPI-B265: Islamic History


Islamic Banking and Finance in South-east Asia

dealt, inter alia, with reviews of the polygamy and divorce laws,

the Muslim calendar and the Shari’ah Courts. The Council has

also sponsored the publication of a series of translations of

hadith, a first volume of which (Mukaddimah Mastika Hadith

Rasulullah) has been published. The Council also provided

training courses for Muslim missionaries and lectures to State

officers on religion.

No doubt, these developments can be seen as a reflection

of a desire to demonstrate independence from the colonial

past. At the same time, though, as this brief historical overview

clearly demonstrates, despite the fact that the common Southeast Asian Islamic experience of the past century and a half

has been one of subjection to secular forces, Islam, as a religion, is more than the sum of individual experiences, hence

present-day demands, which are usually expressed politically,

for an increase in the “Islamic” as opposed to secular content

of law.

Nevertheless, despite these measures, there still remains an

inherent conflict between state law and Muslim law in contemporary Malaysia — the lasting legacy of the formative influence English common law on Malaysia’s legal system. To a

large extent this situation is unavoidable given that Malaysia’s

secular constitution and multi-ethnic population militates

against the adoption of Shari’ah as the state law. In this last

respect it is interesting to note that although recent years have

seen the more heavily Islamicised states within Malaysia —

notably Trengganu and Kelantan — agitating for the adoption

of Shari’ah law, the crushing defeat of the principal Islamicist parties in the 2004 general elections seems to indicate that

the majority of modern Muslim Malaysians would prefer to

continue with the present legal system despite the inevitable

tensions and contradictions between English common law

and Shari’ah. All the same, there can be no doubt that the

April 7, 2005


WSPC/SPI-B265: Islamic History


Colonial Legacies: Islam and State Law in South-east Asia


gradual move towards a more complete and comprehensive

expression of Islamic legalism since independence has helped

to pave the way for the implementation of Islamic banking

over the past twenty-five years as we shall see in the

next chapter.

April 7, 2005


WSPC/SPI-B265: Islamic History


Chapter 8

Islamic Banking in Malaysia

Malaysia certainly has changed under Mahathir’s administration, transformed by twenty-first-century infrastructure

and rapid growth. Yet race and religion remain flash points

in a secular nation with a Muslim majority and prominent Chinese and Indian minorities. For twenty-two years,

Mahathir has held radical Islam at bay without alienating the

Muslim majority to build a prosperous, multiethnic nation.

Under Mahathir, Malays were given Islamic schools and

told that Islamic values were central to government policies. On 31 October 2003, Abdullah Badawi took over from


Among the countries in Asia with aspirations to become

one of the region’s financial centres, Malaysia is making considerable efforts to enhance its financial industry. A distinctive

feature of Malaysia’s economy is the fact that Islamic banking

and financial services have been fully integrated into the country’s existing financial system. In this last respect, Malaysia

provides a good example of the banking industry’s inventiveness and capacity for innovation.

Islamic banking was introduced to Malaysia through

the Islamic Banking Act of 1983 and the simultaneous


Montlake, Simon, “Islam will test new Malaysia chief” (2003),

The Christian Science Monitor (http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1030/

p06s02-woap.htm), 17 June 2004.


April 7, 2005


WSPC/SPI-B265: Islamic History


Islamic Banking in Malaysia


establishment of the Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad. The move

was part of the Malaysian Government’s strategy to support

Muslim Malays who were perceived to be losing out to the

more commercially minded Chinese (although Malays make

up the majority of the country’s population nationwide, in

the capital Kuala Lumpur, and also in provincial Penang, it

is the Chinese who dominate the business sector and who

have played a leading role in the industrialisation and economic growth of Malaysia).140 Nowadays, almost all financial

institutions in Malaysia have opened separate Islamic departments and there are Islamic securities and money markets.

Meanwhile, there are two entirely Islamic Banks, the first being

the aforementioned Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad and the second being Bank Muamalat Malaysia Berhad. The first to be

established, Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad, operates through

eighty-five branches in the country whilst the more recentlyestablished Bank Muamalat Malaysia Berhad has forty-six

branches. In addition to the Islamic banks, there are also thirteen commercial banks that offer products and services under

the Islamic banking scheme.141

Today, Malaysia is believed to have one of the most developed interest-free financial systems in the world. Besides the

Interest-free Banking Scheme, there is an Islamic debt securities market developed in 1990 and an Islamic equity market,

operating since 1995; an Islamic Interbank Money Market was

established in 1994.

As of 30 June 2003, Islamic banking assets accounted

for 9.4 per cent or RM75.5 billion of the banking system in

Malaysia. Deposits and financing accounted for 10 per cent



Davies, Rod, “Malaysia capsule”, Orient Pacific Century, 10 June 2002.

Malaysia Industrial Development Authority, Banking, Finance &

Foreign Exchange Administration (http://www.mida.gov.my/), 17 June


April 7, 2005



WSPC/SPI-B265: Islamic History


Islamic Banking and Finance in South-east Asia

and 9 per cent respectively, whilst takaful assets accounted

for 5.3 per cent.142 The government wants that share to rise

to 20 per cent by 2010 and plans to do this by opening the

door to foreign Islamic banks as well as introducing new measures to help the country emerge as a regional hub for Islamic



Origins of Islamic Banking in Malaysia

In Malaysia, civil disturbances in the late 1960s by ethnic Malay

Muslims protesting at the dominance of ethnic Chinese in

the commercial sector prompted a government programme

to redistribute wealth and concentrate more political power

in the hands of the Muslim Malays. This was at a time when

Islamic traditionalists were also protesting against what they

saw as decadent Western influences, which had taken root in

Malaysia, corrupting the moral and cultural life of the nation.

It was partly in order to placate these activists as well as to

provide business opportunities specifically aimed at Muslim

Malays that the government initiated Islamic banking in parallel with conventional banking on a trial basis. Ten years later, it

made Islamic banking a permanent part of the financial structure, and increasingly takes pride in its Islamic banking sector.

Islamic banking was introduced to Malaysia through the

Islamic Banking Act (IBA) of 1983 and the simultaneous establishment of the Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad. A dual banking system was introduced which allowed Islamic banking

and conventional banking to co-exist side by side. Today,

almost all financial institutions in Malaysia have opened separate Islamic departments and there are Islamic securities and


“Islamic banking sector sets target”, The Star, 19 August 2003.


“Malaysia to accept Islamic banks”, The Financial Gazette, 6 May 2003.

April 7, 2005


WSPC/SPI-B265: Islamic History


Islamic Banking in Malaysia


money markets. Meanwhile, the two entirely Islamic Banks,

the first being the aforementioned Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad

and the second being Bank Muamalat Malaysia Berhad, which

in 2003 had forty branches and total assets of RM7.3 billion.144

The IBA of 1983 was introduced to govern the operations

of Islamic banks in Malaysia. It provided Bank Negara —

Malaysia’s central bank — with powers to supervise and regulate Islamic banks, similar to the case of other licensed banks.

The Government Investment Act 1983 was enacted at the

same time to empower the Government of Malaysia to issue

Government Investment Certificates (GIC), which are government securities issued according to Shari’ah principles. As

GICs are regarded as liquid assets, Islamic banks could invest

in them as a means of meeting prescribed liquidity requirements. They could also invest in them as a way of deploying

their surplus funds. The Government Investment Act 1983 was

subsequently amended for both (Islamic) Statutory Reserves

and the Liquidity Reserve Requirement purposes.

The Banking and Financial Institutions Act (BAFIA) 1989,

which came into force on 1 October of that year, provided for

the licensing and regulation of institutions carrying on banking, finance company, merchant banking, discount house and

money-broking businesses. It also provided for the regulation

of institutions carrying on scheduled business comprising

non-bank sources of credit and finance, such as credit and

charge card companies, building societies, factoring, leasing

companies and development finance institutions.145 In 1996,

section 124 of the BAFIA was amended to allow banks licensed

under this Act to introduce Islamic banking business (1996).




Non-scheduled institutions, which are engaged in the provision of

finance, may be subject to Part X and XI of the BAFIA as the Minister

of Finance may decide.

April 7, 2005


WSPC/SPI-B265: Islamic History


Islamic Banking and Finance in South-east Asia


Bank Negara Guidelines on Islamic Banking


As part of the effort to streamline and harmonise the Shari’ah

interpretations among banks and takaful companies, Bank

Negara Malaysia (BNM, the central bank of Malaysia) established the National Shari’ah Advisory Council (NSAC) on

Islamic Banking and Takaful on 1 May 1997 as the highest

Shari’ah authority on Islamic banking and takaful in Malaysia.

The primary objectives of the NSAC are to act as the sole

authoritative body to advise BNM on Islamic banking and

takaful operations; to co-ordinate Shari’ah issues with respect

to Islamic banking and finance (including takaful); and to analyse and evaluate Shari’ah aspects of new products/schemes

submitted by the banking institutions and takaful companies.

Guidelines pertaining to Islamic banking, issued by Bank

Negara from time to time, are as good as a legal requirement

because under the Bank Negara Ordinance, Malaysia’s central

bank is vested with some powers to regulate the market.

Some examples of these Guidelines include having the

Central Bank instruct all conventional banks operating Islamic

banking business and Islamic financial business to maintain

separate current accounts and clearing accounts with the

Central Bank of Malaysia as the Islamic accounts need to be

used only for transactions which are halah and conducted

according to Shari’ah law. The same reason is also behind the

separate membership code for RENTAS (Real Time Electronic

Transfer of Funds and Securities) to be maintained. In addition,

there should be separate submission of statistical reports in FISS

(Financial Institutions Submission System) on a monthly basis.


The Shari’ah Supervisory Council

In contrast to the Islamic banks that have been set up in

Arab countries since the end of the 1970s, Malaysian financial

April 7, 2005


WSPC/SPI-B265: Islamic History


Islamic Banking in Malaysia


institutions, with the support and encouragement of the

government, have chosen their own approach in interpreting Islamic law and this has allowed them to develop a wide

range of Islamic financial instruments. Of course they must

still fulfil the requirements of Shari’ah law in this respect —

Shari’ah compliance is a core component of the Islamic system of financial management and as noted previously, there

can be no compromise. In Malaysia, the consistency and uniform application of Islamic rules is supervised by the NSAC for

Islamic Banking and Takaful [Islamic insurance] established by

the central bank in 1997.146 Both the IBA and the BAFIA made

the establishment of the Shari’ah Supervisory Council a statutory requirement. The IBA is imposed on a bank that wishes

to conduct Islamic banking [section 3(5) b], whilst the BAFIA

compels Malaysia’s central bank, Bank Negara, to establish

a National Shari’ah Supervisory Council at the national level

to advise the central bank on matters pertaining to Islamic

banking [section 124 (7) a]. Relatively speaking, this move to

implement a Shari’ah regulatory body for financial matters

(the second after Sudan) has proved to be successful in regulating Islamic banking business in terms of Shari’ah compliance

as well as standardisation.


Making Islamic Banking Compatible with

Conventional Banking

Changes were made precisely to recognise and address the

need to reconcile the differences between Islamic and conventional banking. The Stamp Duty Act in 1989 was amended to


Sudan has a Shari’ah Supervisory Board at the central bank and in Iran

they have a committee within the Council of Guardians, which sets the rules

for the banking and finance sector. In other jurisdictions, individual Islamic

financial institutions and the Islamic banking units at conventional financial

institutions appoint their own Shari’ah supervisory boards or advisors.

Tài liệu bạn tìm kiếm đã sẵn sàng tải về

7 Maria Hertogh: A Case in Point

Tải bản đầy đủ ngay(0 tr)